Cost efficiency in extraction considers initial investment, operational costs, and long-term savings.
Higher Initial Investment: CO2 extraction machines are more expensive upfront.
Lower Operating Costs: No need to purchase solvents like butane.
Lower Initial Investment: Butane extraction systems are cheaper to install.
Higher Long-Term Costs: Hydrocarbons require ongoing solvent purchases and compliance costs.
Factor | CO2 Supercritical Extraction | Hydrocarbon Extraction |
---|---|---|
Upfront Cost | High | Low |
Ongoing Costs | Low (CO2 is recyclable) | High (solvent replenishment) |
CO2 supercritical extraction machines may have a higher initial cost, but their lower operating expenses, safety, and regulatory compliance make them the most cost-efficient choice in the long run.
READ MORE:
Supercritical CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Scalability Comparison
CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Equipment Requirements and Considerations
Supercritical CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Efficiency Comparison
Supercritical CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Yield Comparison
CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction for Live Resin: Which Method is Better?
Supercritical CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Safety Concerns and Industry Risks
CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Solvent Residuals and Purity Concerns