Supercritical CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Efficiency Comparison

Introduction

Efficiency in cannabis extraction is measured by extraction time, yield, and ease of post-processing.

Efficiency Factors in CO2 Extraction

• Automated Systems: Modern CO2 supercritical extraction machines feature precise pressure and temperature controls.

• Selective Compound Extraction: Reduces the need for winterization and refining.

Efficiency Factors in Hydrocarbon Extraction

• Faster Initial Extraction: Hydrocarbon extraction typically takes less time per run.

• Requires Extensive Purging: Solvent removal adds processing time.

Efficiency Comparison Table

Conclusion

While hydrocarbon extraction is initially faster, CO2 supercritical extraction machines reduce overall processing time by eliminating solvent purging and post-extraction refinement.

READ MORE：

• Supercritical CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Scalability Comparison

• CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction for Terpene Preservation

• CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Equipment Requirements and Considerations

• CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Cost Efficiency Analysis

• CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction for Cannabis Concentrates

• Supercritical CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Yield Comparison

• CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction for Live Resin: Which Method is Better?

• Supercritical CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Safety Concerns and Industry Risks

• CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Solvent Residuals and Purity Concerns