Supercritical CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Risk Analysis

Introduction

Extraction safety, compliance, and operational risks must be considered when choosing between CO2 supercritical extraction and hydrocarbon methods.

CO2 Supercritical Extraction Risk Profile

• Non-Toxic & Non-Flammable: No combustion risk.

• Minimal Regulatory Restrictions: CO2 extraction is GRAS-approved.

Hydrocarbon Extraction Risk Profile

• Explosion Hazard: Butane and propane are highly flammable.

• Strict Compliance Requirements: Some jurisdictions ban hydrocarbon extraction.

Risk Comparison

Conclusion

For safe, regulatory-compliant extraction, CO2 supercritical extraction machines offer the lowest risk option.

READ MORE：

• CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Temperature Differences and Their Impact on Extraction Quality

• Supercritical CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction for Premium Cannabis Products

• CO2 Extraction vs Solvent Extraction for Botanical Oils: A Complete Comparison

• CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction for BHO Concentrates: Which Method is Better?

• CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction Process Time: Which is More Efficient?

• Supercritical CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Environmental Impact

• CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Product Purity Testing

• Supercritical CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction: Regulatory Compliance

• CO2 vs Hydrocarbon Extraction for Solvent-Free Extracts