CO2 vs Ethanol Extraction for Botanical Extracts
来源: | 作者:selina | 发布时间 :2025-02-27 | 33 次浏览: | Share:

 CO2 vs Ethanol Extraction for Botanical Extracts

Introduction

Botanical extraction plays a crucial role in producing high-quality essential oils, herbal extracts, and bioactive compounds. Two major extraction methods dominate the industry: CO2 supercritical extraction and ethanol extraction. Each technique has unique advantages, but CO2 supercritical extraction machines have gained prominence due to their ability to produce purer, solvent-free extracts. This article explores their differences in terms of efficiency, purity, cost, and environmental impact.

Extraction Process Comparison

CO2 Supercritical Extraction

  • Uses supercritical CO2, which behaves as both a liquid and gas to dissolve plant compounds.

  • Operates at 31°C and 74 bar, ensuring delicate compounds are preserved.

  • Produces solvent-free extracts, eliminating the need for post-processing.

Ethanol Extraction

  • Uses ethanol as a solvent to extract plant compounds.

  • Requires winterization and evaporation to remove unwanted lipids and residual solvent.

  • High ethanol consumption increases costs and processing time.

Purity and Product Quality

  • CO2 extraction preserves delicate terpenes and flavonoids, yielding a more natural profile.

  • Ethanol extraction often requires further refinement, increasing degradation risks.

  • Studies show CO2-extracted botanical oils have up to 20% higher purity than ethanol-extracted counterparts.

Efficiency and Yield

Cost and Environmental Impact

  • CO2 extraction is initially costly but more sustainable due to solvent recycling.

  • Ethanol extraction involves higher operational costs due to solvent recovery and losses.

  • CO2 is eco-friendly, whereas ethanol poses flammability risks.

Conclusion

For high-quality botanical extracts, CO2 supercritical extraction machines are superior, offering solvent-free, highly pure, and environmentally friendly solutions.


READ MORE: