The choice between CO2 supercritical extraction and steam distillation is a critical decision for industries that require pure, high-quality extracts. Both methods have been widely used in industries such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food processing. However, CO2 extraction has gained popularity due to its efficiency, versatility, and ability to preserve delicate compounds.
Shanghai North Brooks Co., Ltd., a leading manufacturer of CO2 supercritical extraction machines, has revolutionized the industry by offering state-of-the-art technology. This article will compare CO2 extraction and steam distillation, helping businesses choose the best extraction method.
CO2 extraction uses pressurized carbon dioxide to separate target compounds from raw materials. At high pressures, CO2 becomes a supercritical fluid, exhibiting both gas-like and liquid-like properties, allowing it to penetrate materials and extract essential compounds.
Steam distillation, one of the oldest extraction methods, involves passing steam through plant materials to separate essential oils. The extracted compounds are then cooled and condensed into liquid form.
| Feature | CO2 Supercritical Extraction | Steam Distillation |
|---|---|---|
| Purity | ✅ High – Solvent-free | ❌ Lower – Heat may alter composition |
| Efficiency | ✅ High – Higher yield & precision | ❌ Lower – Loss of volatile compounds |
The CO2 supercritical extraction machine by Shanghai North Brooks Co., Ltd. is a game-changer for businesses that require high-quality extracts with maximum efficiency. While steam distillation remains relevant, CO2 extraction is clearly the superior choice for industries looking to innovate and scale.
READ MORE: