CO2 vs Steam Distillation Cost Efficiency

Cost efficiency is a major factor when selecting an extraction method for **essential oils, bioactive compounds, and fragrances**. This article compares **supercritical CO2 extraction** and **steam distillation** in terms of **investment costs, operational expenses, and long-term profitability**.

1. Initial Investment and Setup Costs

• Supercritical CO2 Extraction: Higher **initial investment** for equipment but **long-term cost savings**.
• Steam Distillation: Lower setup costs but **higher ongoing expenses** due to energy use.

2. Operational Costs and Energy Consumption

• CO2 Extraction: Uses **recyclable CO2**, reducing material and operational costs.
• Steam Distillation: Requires **constant heat and water**, increasing **utility expenses**.

3. Long-Term Cost Savings and ROI

• CO2 Extraction: Generates **higher yields and purer extracts**, leading to **premium product pricing**.
• Steam Distillation: Produces **lower yields**, impacting **profitability over time**.

4. Case Study: CO2 Extraction in Essential Oil Manufacturing

A company reduced **energy costs by 35%** and **increased profitability** after adopting CO2 extraction.

5. Conclusion

For **long-term cost efficiency**, **supercritical CO2 extraction** offers **better savings and profitability**. Companies like **SHANGHAI NORTH BROOKS** provide **CO2 SUPERCRITICAL EXTRACTION MACHINE** solutions for **cost-effective extractions**.

READ MORE：

• CO2 vs Ethanol vs Hydrocarbon for Cannabis Extracts
• Supercritical CO2 Extraction vs Traditional Solvent Methods
• CO2 vs Solvent vs Steam Distillation Extraction
• Supercritical CO2 vs Ethanol vs Hydrocarbon Extraction
• CO2 vs Steam Distillation for Anti-Inflammatory Compounds
• Supercritical CO2 vs Steam Distillation Solvent Usage
• CO2 vs Steam Distillation for Rose Oil Extraction
• Supercritical CO2 vs Steam Distillation Chemical-Free Process
• Supercritical CO2 vs Steam Distillation Scalability