CO2 Extraction vs Steam Distillation Yield Comparison

Extraction yield is a key factor when choosing between **supercritical CO2 extraction** and **steam distillation** for essential oils and bioactive compounds. This article examines their **extraction rates, efficiency, and waste reduction**.

1. Extraction Efficiency and Yield

• Supercritical CO2 Extraction: Extracts **more essential oil per unit of plant material**, reducing raw material waste.

• Steam Distillation: **Lower extraction yield** due to heat-induced compound loss.

2. Time and Energy Consumption

• CO2 Extraction: **Faster processing times**, reducing overall energy consumption.

• Steam Distillation: Requires **longer heating periods**, leading to higher energy costs.

3. Impact on Product Quality

• CO2 Extraction: Produces **purer and more potent extracts**.

• Steam Distillation: May lead to **compound degradation** and **loss of volatile elements**.

4. Case Study: CO2 Extraction in High-Yield Essential Oils

A manufacturer increased **oil yield by 35%** after switching from steam distillation to CO2 extraction, improving product quality and profitability.

5. Conclusion

For **higher yield and efficiency**, **supercritical CO2 extraction** is the preferred method. Companies like **SHANGHAI NORTH BROOKS** offer **CO2 SUPERCRITICAL EXTRACTION MACHINE** solutions for **maximizing extraction efficiency**.

READ MORE：

• Supercritical CO2 vs Steam Distillation for Essential Oils

• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Organic Certification

• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Algae Oils

• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Chemical Residue Concerns

• CO2 Extraction vs Solvent Extraction Yield Comparison

• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Industrial Applications

• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Bioactive Compounds

• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Cosmetic Ingredients

• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Plant-Based Products