CO2 Extraction vs Solvent Extraction Yield Comparison

Yield efficiency is a key factor in choosing an extraction method, impacting **costs, resource utilization, and sustainability**. This article compares the extraction yield of supercritical CO2 extraction and solvent extraction.

1. Yield Efficiency and Waste Reduction

• Supercritical CO2 Extraction: **Higher yield efficiency**, as CO2 selectively targets bioactive compounds.
• Solvent Extraction: May extract **undesirable waxes and fats**, leading to lower net yield.

2. Energy and Resource Utilization

• CO2 Extraction: Uses **recyclable CO2**, reducing **resource waste**.
• Solvent Extraction: Requires **continuous solvent purchases**, increasing long-term costs.

3. Industrial Application of High-Yield Extractions

• CO2 Extraction: Used in **CBD, pharmaceuticals, and plant oils** for **maximum efficiency**.
• Solvent Extraction: Used for **bulk chemical extractions** but **less efficient for premium products**.

4. Case Study: CO2 Extraction in Hemp Industry

A hemp extract manufacturer increased **yield efficiency by 30%** after switching from solvent to CO2 extraction.

5. Conclusion

For **higher yield and cost efficiency**, **supercritical CO2 extraction** outperforms solvent extraction. Companies like **SHANGHAI NORTH BROOKS** provide **CO2 SUPERCRITICAL EXTRACTION MACHINE** solutions for **high-yield processing**.

READ MORE：

• CO2 Extraction vs Steam Distillation Yield Comparison
• Supercritical CO2 vs Steam Distillation for Essential Oils
• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Organic Certification
• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Algae Oils
• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Chemical Residue Concerns
• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Industrial Applications
• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Bioactive Compounds
• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Cosmetic Ingredients
• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Plant-Based Products