CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Bioactive Compounds

Bioactive compounds are essential in **nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics**. The choice of extraction method—supercritical CO2 extraction vs. solvent extraction—impacts **efficiency, purity, and applicability**.

1. Efficiency in Extracting Bioactive Compounds

• Supercritical CO2 Extraction: **Targets specific bioactive molecules**, reducing unnecessary byproducts.
• Solvent Extraction: Less selective, often extracting **unwanted impurities**.

2. Purity and Chemical Stability

• CO2 Extraction: Preserves **heat-sensitive bioactives**, maintaining full potency.
• Solvent Extraction: May alter **compound structure** due to solvent interaction.

3. Industry Applications

• CO2 Extraction: Used for **functional foods, herbal supplements, and medical-grade compounds**.
• Solvent Extraction: More common in **industrial-scale applications** but requires **further refining**.

4. Case Study: CO2 Extraction in Functional Nutrition

A functional food company switched to CO2 extraction, **enhancing bioactive retention by 40%**, leading to **higher product efficacy**.

5. Conclusion

For **bioactive compound extraction**, **supercritical CO2 extraction** ensures **maximum potency and purity**. Companies like **SHANGHAI NORTH BROOKS** provide **CO2 SUPERCRITICAL EXTRACTION MACHINE** solutions for **high-value bioactive extraction**.

READ MORE：

• CO2 Extraction vs Steam Distillation Yield Comparison
• Supercritical CO2 vs Steam Distillation for Essential Oils
• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Organic Certification
• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Algae Oils
• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Chemical Residue Concerns
• CO2 Extraction vs Solvent Extraction Yield Comparison
• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Industrial Applications
• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Cosmetic Ingredients
• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Plant-Based Products