CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Efficiency Comparison

Extraction efficiency is a key factor when choosing between supercritical CO2 extraction and solvent extraction. This article compares their efficiency based on **yield, energy consumption, and processing time**.

1. Extraction Yield

• Supercritical CO2 Extraction: **Higher yield** due to **precise compound targeting**, reducing waste.
• Solvent Extraction: Less efficient, often extracting **undesirable impurities** that require additional refinement.

2. Energy Consumption

• CO2 Extraction: Requires **moderate energy** for pressurization but **recycles CO2**, reducing overall costs.
• Solvent Extraction: **High energy demand** for solvent evaporation, increasing operational expenses.

3. Processing Time

• CO2 Extraction: Faster **extraction and purification**, minimizing post-processing.
• Solvent Extraction: Longer process due to **solvent recovery and purification steps**.

4. Case Study: CO2 Extraction in Herbal Supplements

A supplement manufacturer **increased production efficiency by 30%** after switching to CO2 extraction, improving **yield and processing speed**.

5. Conclusion

For **maximum efficiency**, supercritical CO2 extraction outperforms solvent extraction. Companies like **SHANGHAI NORTH BROOKS** provide **CO2 SUPERCRITICAL EXTRACTION MACHINE** solutions designed for **high-yield and energy-efficient extractions**.

READ MORE：

• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Temperature Control
• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Nicotine Extraction
• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Safety Comparison
• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Regulatory Approval
• CO2 Extraction vs Solvent Extraction for Pharmaceuticals
• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Hemp Extracts
• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Cost Efficiency
• CO2 vs Solvent Extraction for Natural Flavor Extraction
• Supercritical CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Purity Level