CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Cost Efficiency
来源: | 作者:selina | 发布时间 :2025-03-03 | 140 次浏览: | Share:

CO2 vs Solvent Extraction Cost Efficiency

When choosing an extraction method, **cost efficiency** plays a major role in decision-making. This article compares **supercritical CO2 extraction** and **solvent extraction** in terms of operational costs, extraction yield, and long-term benefits for businesses.

1. Initial Investment and Equipment Costs

  • CO2 Extraction: Requires **higher initial investment** for specialized equipment but offers **long-term savings**.
  • Solvent Extraction: Equipment is **cheaper upfront**, but continuous solvent purchases **increase long-term costs**.

2. Operating Costs

  • CO2 Extraction: Uses **recyclable CO2**, reducing consumable costs.
  • Solvent Extraction: Requires **continuous solvent purchase**, adding to recurring expenses.

3. Yield and Product Value

  • CO2 Extraction: Produces **higher-quality extracts**, allowing companies to sell premium products.
  • Solvent Extraction: May lead to **lower-quality extracts** due to solvent contamination, reducing market value.

4. Case Study: Cost Efficiency in Essential Oil Production

A European essential oil manufacturer switched from solvent extraction to **CO2 extraction**, leading to a **20% increase in profitability** due to higher yields and lower waste.

5. Conclusion

While CO2 extraction requires a **higher initial investment**, it proves to be **more cost-efficient** over time. Companies like **SHANGHAI NORTH BROOKS** provide **state-of-the-art CO2 extraction systems**, helping businesses maximize long-term cost efficiency.

READ MORE：

按钮文本