Botanical extracts are widely used in cosmetics, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals, making extraction quality essential. The two main extraction methods—supercritical CO2 and ethanol extraction—offer different advantages. This article compares their effectiveness and explains how a CO2 supercritical extraction machine ensures superior purity and efficiency.
When extracting botanical compounds, several factors influence quality:
Purity: Avoiding unwanted compounds such as waxes and chlorophyll.
Retention of Active Ingredients: Ensuring essential compounds like polyphenols, flavonoids, and terpenes are preserved.
Solvent Safety: Preventing contamination from residual solvents.
The CO2 supercritical extraction machine is highly effective for botanical extracts:
Selective Extraction: CO2 can target specific compounds while leaving unwanted materials behind.
Low-Temperature Process: Preserves heat-sensitive compounds like flavonoids and terpenes.
Solvent-Free: No residual solvents remain in the extract.
Ethanol extraction is another common method but has challenges:
Full-Spectrum Extraction: Extracts all compounds, including unwanted materials that require refining.
Solvent Removal Required: Ethanol must be evaporated, increasing processing time.
Heat Exposure: Solvent recovery can degrade delicate botanical compounds.
Purity: CO2 extraction results in cleaner, more selective extracts.
Processing Efficiency: Ethanol is faster but requires more post-processing.
Regulatory Compliance: CO2 extraction meets stricter safety and food-grade requirements.
A CO2 supercritical extraction machine ensures precise control over botanical extraction, optimizing purity and compound retention.
CO2 extraction provides better purity and control, while ethanol extraction is faster but requires extensive refining. Investing in a CO2 supercritical extraction machine guarantees higher-quality botanical extracts with minimal post-processing.
READ MORE: